• Catalogue PIGMA
  •  
  •  
  •  

Willingness to pay to conserve Mediterranean marine fauna (Actinopterygii, Chondrichthyes, Mammalia, Reptilia) in France

The willingness to pay (WTP) of people to protect animal populations can be used as a tool for these populations’ conservation. The WTP reflects the non-use value of animals, which can be significant for charismatic species. This value can be used as an economic criterion for decision-makers in order to recommend protective measures. The definition of the WTP to protect a species is challenging, as valuation methods are time-consuming and expensive. To overcome these limitations, we built a benefit transfer function based on 112 valuation studies and apply it to 440 Mediterranean marine species. We extracted these species from the IUCN database and retrieved some required parameters from, amongst others, the FishBase database. Marine mammals appear to have the highest WTP value followed in order by sea turtles, sharks and rays, and ray-finned fishes. Commercial fish species appear to have the highest values amongst the fish class.

Simple

Date (Publication)
2019-03
Date (Revision)
2021-05-12
Other citation details
Maxime Sèbe (2019). Willingness to pay to conserve Mediterranean marine fauna (Actinopterygii, Chondrichthyes, Mammalia, Reptilia) in France. SEANOE. https://doi.org/10.17882/75324
Author
  University of Brest, Ifremer, CNRS, UMR 6308, AMURE, Unité d’Economie Maritime, IUEM, Plouzané, France. - Maxime Sèbe
Publisher
  SEANOE
Theme
  • Marine species
  • Mediterranean
  • Actinopterygii
  • Chondrichthyes
  • Mammalia
  • Reptilia
  • Willingness to pay
  • Non-use value
  • Benefit transfer
  • Human activities
  • Environment
ODATIS aggregation parameters and Essential Variable names
  • Fish
  • Human activities
  • Marine turtles, birds, mammals
SeaDataNet Parameter Disciplines
  • Human activities
  • Environment
Type de jeux de donnée ODATIS
  • Analysis data
Use limitation
CC-BY (Creative Commons - Attribution)
Use constraints
Other restrictions
Other constraints
To be noted that values for anguilliform fishes are to be taken with caution. As no species were comparable in terms of characteristics for building the benefit transfer function, the values for these species might be biased. The author might have eluded similar biases for other species. Dedicated studies to refine the results might be required for some species; this database only provides some basic values.
Metadata language
English
Topic category
  • Oceans
N
S
E
W
thumbnail


Distribution format
  • CSV ( )

OnLine resource
Processed data ( WWW:DOWNLOAD-1.0-link--download )

Data for benefit transfer function building - 40 KB

OnLine resource
Processed data ( WWW:DOWNLOAD-1.0-link--download )

WTP value in France for Mediterranean Marine species - 80 KB

OnLine resource
DOI of the product ( WWW:LINK-1.0-http--metadata-URL )
OnLine resource
Seanoe ( rel-canonical )
Hierarchy level
Dataset
Statement

1) DATABASES

We propose here two databases:

1.1) 2017_WTP_LITERATURE_DATABASE

This database describes the variables used to build the benefit transfer function. We built this database using Amuakwa-Mensah database and the USGS Benefit Transfer Toolkit, and by consolidating these databases with a literature review. The CSV file contains all the variables required to build the benefit transfer function using the R code below (parameters are set as dummy variables).

/////

## CHOOSE DIRECTORY setwd("~/CHOOSE DIRECTORY") #PACKAGES library(Hmisc) library(corrplot) #1_BENEFIT TRANSFER FUNCTION BUILDING WTP_database<-read.table("2017_WTP_LITERATURE_DATABASE.txt",h=T) ##database loading linearMod <- lm(ln_WTP ~ ToC_No_dim + Local_Stat_No+ SurvTyp_face2face + SurvTyp_Internet + SurvTyp_Mix + SurvTyp_Phone + ln_GDP_PPP + ValuationMethod_CE + ValuationMethod_Hybrid + mod_Trustfund + mod_bill + mod_Unspecified + mod_Membership + Freq_Monthly + Freq_Once + Freq_Unspec + Units_perPerson + Class_bird + Class_MarinFish + Class_Freshwaterfish + Class_freshwaterMammal + Class_MarineRiv_fish + Class_MarineReptile + Class_TerrestrialMammal + ln_Mean_Lenght + ln_Mean_Weight,data=WTP_database)  # build linear regression model on database print(linearMod) summary(linearMod)

////

Field of the CSV file :

Reference : source of the information

Location : Location of the study

SiteName : Location of the study (more detailed)

PrimarySpecies : Studied species

TypeofChange_mod : Type of change in the conservation status aimed

ToC_No_dim : Type of change in the conservation status aimed (dummy : increase (ref) vs. no depletion)

Local_Stat : Local Endangerement status

Local_Stat_No: Local Endangerement status (dummy: endangered (ref) vs. not endangered)

SurvTyp: Type of survey

SurvTyp_face2face: Type of survey (dummy: mail (ref) vs. face2face vs. internet vs. mixed vs. phone)

SurvTyp_Internet: Type of survey (dummy: mail (ref) vs. face2face vs. internet vs. mixed vs. phone)

SurvTyp_Mix: Type of survey (dummy: mail (ref) vs. face2face vs. internet vs. mixed vs. phone)

SurvTyp_Phone: Type of survey (dummy: mail (ref) vs. face2face vs. internet vs. mixed vs. phone)

GDP_PPP: Country GDP-PPP at the time of the study

ln_GDP_PPP: Logarithm of the country GDP-PPP at the time of the study

YearDataWereCollected: Year of the data collection

SampleFrame_mod: Sample frame as the type of respondent

SampleFrame_vis: Sample frame as the type of respondent (dummy: resident (ref) vs. visitor)

ValuationMethod: Valuation Method

ValuationMethod_CE: Valuation Method (dummy: CMV (ref) vs. CE vs. hybrid)

ValuationMethod_Hybrid: Valuation Method (dummy: CMV (ref) vs. CE vs. hybrid)

Way_mod: Way of payment

mod_Trustfund: Way of payment (dummy: tax (ref) vs. bill vs. unspecified vs. membership)

mod_bill: Way of payment (dummy: tax (ref) vs. bill vs. unspecified vs. membership)

mod_Unspecified: Way of payment (dummy: tax (ref) vs. bill vs. unspecified vs. membership)

mod_Membership: Way of payment (dummy: tax (ref) vs. bill vs. unspecified vs. membership)

Freq_mod: Frequency of payment

Freq_Monthly: Frequency of payment (dummy: annual (ref) vs. monthly vs. once vs. per visit vs. unspecified)

Freq_Once: Frequency of payment (dummy: annual (ref) vs. monthly vs. once vs. per visit vs. unspecified)

Freq_pervisit: Frequency of payment (dummy: annual (ref) vs. monthly vs. once vs. per visit vs. unspecified)

Freq_Unspec: Frequency of payment (dummy: annual (ref) vs. monthly vs. once vs. per visit vs. unspecified)

WTP: WTP results of the original study (corrected for inflation to the year 2017)

ln_WTP: Logarithm of the WTP results of the original study (corrected for inflation to the year 2017)

Units_mod: Unit of the willingness to pay ($ per person, household or per visit)

Units_perPerson: Unit of the willingness to pay (dummy: per household (ref) vs. per person vs. per visit)

Units_pervisit: Unit of the willingness to pay (dummy: per household (ref) vs. per person vs. per visit)

Animal_class: Animal class

Class_bird: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)

Class_MarinFish: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)

Class_Freshwaterfish: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)

Class_freshwaterMammal: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)

Class_MarineRiv_fish: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)

Class_MarineReptile: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)

Class_TerrestrialMammal: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)

Mean_Lenght: Mean length (m)

ln_Mean_Lenght: Logarithm of the mean length

Mean_Weight: Mean weight (kg)

ln_Mean_Weight: Logarithm of the mean weight

 

 

1.2) 2017_WTP_MARINE_SPECIES_FRANCE

We extracted marine species form the IUCN database and only selected the ones belonging to the following group: Actinopterygii, Chondrichthyes, Mammalia, Reptilia. We extracted the average length and weight form the FishBase database (Actinopterygii, Chondrichthyes), Shirihai and Jarrett (2007; Mammalia) and Sea Turtle Conservancy database (Reptilia). We then applied the benefit transfer function (1) in order to calculate the WTP to conserve each species based on an annual tax payment per person in France. To be noted that the WTP for another country can be calculated by applying the relevant GDP-PPP to the benefit transfer function.

 

Field of the CSV file :

internalTaxonId: Identification from IUCN

kingdomName: Species kingdom

phylumName: Species phylum

orderName: Species order

className: Species class

familyName: Species family

genusName: Species genus

speciesName: Species

Genus_species: Genus species

redlistCategory_Local: Endangerment at the local scale

redlistCategory: Endangerment at the international scale

populationTrend: Global trend

Local_Stat_No(combined): Endangerment at the local  or international scale (if the local scale is not available) (dummy: endangered (ref) vs. not endangered)

Class_bird: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)

Class_MarinFish: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)

Class_Freshwaterfish: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)

Class_freshwaterMammal: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)

Class_MarineRiv_fish: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)

Class_MarineReptile: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)

Class_TerrestrialMammal: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)

Class_Other: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)

Class_MarinFish: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)

GDP_PPP_France: France GDP-PPP in 2017

Lmean: Mean length (m)

Wmean: Mean weigth (kg)

WTP_france_conser: WTP to conserve a population per year per person

 

2) LIMITATIONS AND WARNINGS

 

The values in the 2017_WTP_MARINE_SPECIES_FRANCE file can only be used separately in valuation processes, as these values are not additive (Beaumont, 2008). However, they can be used simultaneously as an indicator of people’s preferences for protecting a population in comparison to others (see figure provided).

To be noted that values for anguilliform fishes are to be taken with caution. As no species were comparable in terms of characteristics for building the benefit transfer function, the values for these species might be biased. The author might have eluded similar biases for other species. Dedicated studies to refine the results might be required for some species; this database only provides some basic values.

File identifier
seanoe:75324 XML
Metadata language
English
Character set
UTF8
Hierarchy level
Dataset
Date stamp
2021-05-12
Metadata standard name
ISO 19115:2003/19139
Metadata standard version
1.0
Point of contact
  University of Brest, Ifremer, CNRS, UMR 6308, AMURE, Unité d’Economie Maritime, IUEM, Plouzané, France. - Maxime Sèbe
 
 

Overviews

overview
WTP to conserve marine species by class in France. The width of the violin represents the density of species for the corresponding value of WTP. The red point represents the mean WTP value for the animal class.

Spatial extent

N
S
E
W
thumbnail


Keywords

Actinopterygii Benefit transfer Chondrichthyes Environment Human activities Mammalia Marine species Mediterranean Non-use value Reptilia Willingness to pay
ODATIS aggregation parameters and Essential Variable names
Fish Human activities Marine turtles, birds, mammals
Type de jeux de donnée ODATIS
Analysis data

Provided by

logo
Access to the portal
Read here the full details and access to the data.

Associated resources

Not available


  •  
  •  
  •