This visualization product displays the spatial distribution of the sampling effort over the six-years' period 2017-2022. EMODnet Chemistry included the collection of marine litter in its 3rd phase. Since the beginning of 2018, data of seafloor litter collected by international fish-trawl surveys have been gathered and processed in the EMODnet Chemistry Marine Litter Database (MLDB). The harmonization of all the data has been the most challenging task considering the heterogeneity of the data sources, sampling protocols (OSPAR and MEDITS protocols) and reference lists used on a European scale. Moreover, within the same protocol, different gear types are deployed during bottom trawl surveys. The spatial distribution was determined by calculating the number of times each cell was sampled during the period 2017-2022. The corresponding total distance (kms) sampled in each cell is also provided in the attribute table. Information on data processing and calculation are detailed in the attached methodology document. Warning: the absence of data on the map does not necessarily mean that they do not exist, but that no information has been entered in the Marine Litter Database for this area. This work is based on the work presented in the following scientific article: O. Gerigny, M. Brun, M.C. Fabri, C. Tomasino, M. Le Moigne, A. Jadaud, F. Galgani, Seafloor litter from the continental shelf and canyons in French Mediterranean Water: Distribution, typologies and trends, Marine Pollution Bulletin, Volume 146, 2019, Pages 653-666, ISSN 0025-326X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.07.030.

This dataset comprises two netcdf files. The first file contains the six global two-dimensional maps necessary to implement the tidal mixing parameterization presented in de Lavergne et al. (2020). Four power fields (E_wwi, E_sho, E_cri and E_hil) represent depth-integrated internal tide energy dissipation, with units of Watts per square meter. Each power field corresponds to a specific dissipative process and associated vertical structure of turbulence production. The two remaining fields, H_cri and H_bot, are decay heights (with units of meters) that enter the vertical structures of the E_cri and E_hil components, respectively. The second file contains three-dimensional fields of turbulence production (with units of Watts per kilogram) obtained by application of the parameterization to the WOCE global hydrographic climatology. The file includes the total turbulence production (epsilon_tid), its four components (epsilon_wwi, epsilon_sho, epsilon_cri, epsilon_hil), and the underlying hydrographic fields, as a function of longitude, latitude and depth. All maps have a horizontal resolution of 0.5º. Detailed documentation of the parameterization can be found in the following publication: de Lavergne, C., Vic, C., Madec, G., Roquet, F., Waterhouse, A.F., Whalen, C.B., Cuypers, Y., Bouruet-Aubertot, P., Ferron, B., Hibiya, T. A parameterization of local and remote tidal mixing. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 12, e2020MS002065 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002065

This visualization product displays the type of litter in percent per net per year from specific protocols different from research and monitoring protocols. EMODnet Chemistry included the collection of marine litter in its 3rd phase. Before 2021, there was no coordinated effort at the regional or European scale for micro-litter. Given this situation, EMODnet Chemistry proposed to adopt the data gathering and data management approach as generally applied for marine data, i.e., populating metadata and data in the CDI Data Discovery and Access service using dedicated SeaDataNet data transport formats. EMODnet Chemistry is currently the official EU collector of micro-litter data from Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) National Monitoring activities (descriptor 10). A series of specific standard vocabularies or standard terms related to micro-litter have been added to SeaDataNet NVS (NERC Vocabulary Server) Common Vocabularies to describe the micro-litter. European micro-litter data are collected by the National Oceanographic Data Centres (NODCs). Micro-litter map products are generated from NODCs data after a test of the aggregated collection including data and data format checks and data harmonization. A filter is applied to represent only micro-litter sampled according to a very specific protocol such as the Volvo Ocean Race (VOR) or Oceaneye. To calculate percentages for each type, formula applied is: Type (%) = (∑number of particles of each type)*100 / (∑number of particles of all type) When the number of micro-litters was not filled or was equal to zero, it was not possible to calculate the percentage. Standard vocabularies for micro-litter types are taken from Seadatanet's H01 library (https://vocab.seadatanet.org/v_bodc_vocab_v2/search.asp?lib=H01). Some morphological types of micro-litters may have been sampled but were not defined by the protocole applied during the survey. They are represented as « undefined micro-litter items ». Warnings: - the absence of data on the map does not necessarily mean that they do not exist, but that no information has been entered in the National Oceanographic Data Centre (NODC) for this area. - since 03/07/2023, the preferred label « Undefined micro-litter items » has been integrated into the H01 library whereas the labels « microplastic items », « non-plastic man-made micro-particles (e.g. glass, metal, tar) » and «non-plastic filaments (natural fibres, rubber) » have been deprecated. When defined, the material or polymer type can be checked directly in the source data.

This visualization product displays the fishing & aquaculture related plastic items abundance of marine macro-litter (> 2.5cm) per beach per year from Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) monitoring surveys. EMODnet Chemistry included the collection of marine litter in its 3rd phase. Since the beginning of 2018, data of beach litter have been gathered and processed in the EMODnet Chemistry Marine Litter Database (MLDB). The harmonization of all the data has been the most challenging task considering the heterogeneity of the data sources, sampling protocols and reference lists used on a European scale. Preliminary processings were necessary to harmonize all the data: - Exclusion of OSPAR 1000 protocol: in order to follow the approach of OSPAR that it is not including these data anymore in the monitoring; - Selection of MSFD surveys only (exclusion of other monitoring, cleaning and research operations); - Exclusion of beaches without coordinates; - Selection of plastic bags related items only. The list of selected items is attached to this metadata. This list was created using EU Marine Beach Litter Baselines, the European Threshold Value for Macro Litter on Coastlines and the Joint list of litter categories for marine macro-litter monitoring from JRC (these three documents are attached to this metadata); - Normalization of survey lengths to 100m & 1 survey / year: in some case, the survey length was not exactly 100m, so in order to be able to compare the abundance of litter from different beaches a normalization is applied using this formula: Number of plastic bags related items of the survey (normalized by 100 m) = Number of plastic bags related items of the survey x (100 / survey length) Then, this normalized number of plastic bags related items is summed to obtain the total normalized number of plastic bags related items for each survey. Finally, the median abundance of plastic bags related items for each beach and year is calculated from these normalized abundances of plastic bags related items per survey. Sometimes the survey length was null or equal to 0. Assuming that the MSFD protocol has been applied, the length has been set at 100m in these cases. Percentiles 50, 75, 95 & 99 have been calculated taking into account plastic bags related items from MSFD data for all years. More information is available in the attached documents. Warning: the absence of data on the map does not necessarily mean that they do not exist, but that no information has been entered in the Marine Litter Database for this area.

The present repository makes available the model, material and outputs of the ISIS-Fish modeling work showcased in the peer-reviewed scientific article by Bastardie et al. 2025. As part of the SEAwise research project (seawiseproject.org), we used an ISIS-Fish database (Mahevas et al 2003, Pelletier et al. 2009, isis-fish.org) previously developed within the MACCO project which describes the mixed demersal fishery in the Bay of Biscay. For this application, the spatial extent of the fishery is the Bay of Biscay, defined here by ICES divisions 8a, 8b and 8d and the resolution chosen is 1/16 ICES statistical rectangle. The biological module (Vajas et al. 2024) includes 7 species of economic interest in the mixed demersal fishery: European hake (Merluccius merluccius), common sole (Solea solea), Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus), megrim (Lepidorhombus whiffiagonis), anglerfish (Lophius piscatorius) and two ray species (Raja clavata, Leucoraja naevus). The fishing activities module (Mahevas et al. 2024) is made up of 41 demersal fleets (including all French vessels < 12 meters and > 12 meters fishing in this area, Spanich, UK and Belgium fleets) and 431 métiers (combination of a gear, location and mix of target species) catching these 7 species, as target or bycatch. Monthly effort of a fleet distributes among the possible métiers (those historically practiced). The biological and fishing activity modules are identical to the published version. The original model used here has been calibrated on historical catch data 2015-2018 by tuning accessibility and catchability parameters. In the present application the Bay of Biscay model is used to investigate the spatial- and effort- based fisheries management strategies. Consistently with for a task of the SEAwise project (Bastardie et al. 2024) simulations were conducted from 2021 onwards, projecting the effect of an implementation of 3 different closures from 2022 to 2050, under current fishing effort conditions or in a context of fishing effort reduction. Outcomes of these simulations are averaged over short/medium (10 year horizon) and long-term period (20 year horizon). The data project includes: 1) the database including the biological module and fishing activity module; 2) 8 .properties files, each corresponding to one combination of management measure and closure, to restore the simulations parameters in the ISIS-Fish interface and reproduce the simulation runs; 3) the .java scripts to force effort dynamics and simulate spatio-temporal closures, as well as generate the main output files - they will be called by the ISIS-Fish software once the simulations restored 4) the .rds containing the main outputs of the simulations and the associated .html document displaying the R code to compute the indices of interest at different levels of aggregation and reproduce the figures in Bastardie et al. 2025. All files are provided in the Zip. Associated with this material, a study summary and a readme .docx are provided. The first one provides context on the present work and describes the model and simulations' design. The second provides guidelines to reproduce the simulations and their derived outcomes from the data project material made available in this repository. They are both directly downloadable from this repository and are also copied to the zipped folder containing the data project. All the data are reproducible using isis-fish-4.4.8.1 (isis-fish.org; available at forge.codelutin.com) and R 4.2.0.

This visualization product displays the cigarette related items abundance of marine macro-litter (> 2.5cm) per beach per year from Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) monitoring surveys without UNEP-MARLIN data. EMODnet Chemistry included the collection of marine litter in its 3rd phase. Since the beginning of 2018, data of beach litter have been gathered and processed in the EMODnet Chemistry Marine Litter Database (MLDB). The harmonization of all the data has been the most challenging task considering the heterogeneity of the data sources, sampling protocols and reference lists used on a European scale. Preliminary processings were necessary to harmonize all the data: - Exclusion of OSPAR 1000 protocol: in order to follow the approach of OSPAR that it is not including these data anymore in the monitoring; - Selection of MSFD surveys only (exclusion of other monitoring, cleaning and research operations); - Exclusion of beaches without coordinates; - Selection of cigarette related items only. The list of selected items is attached to this metadata. This list was created using EU Marine Beach Litter Baselines, the European Threshold Value for Macro Litter on Coastlines and the Joint list of litter categories for marine macro-litter monitoring from JRC (these three documents are attached to this metadata); - Selection of surveys referring to the UNEP-MARLIN list: the UNEP-MARLIN protocol differs from the other types of monitoring in that cigarette butts are surveyed in a 10m square. To avoid comparing abundances from very different protocols, the choice has been made to distinguish in two maps the cigarette related items results associated with the UNEP-MARLIN list from the others; - Normalization of survey lengths to 100m & 1 survey / year: in some case, the survey length was not exactly 100m, so in order to be able to compare the abundance of litter from different beaches a normalization is applied using this formula: Number of cigarette related items of the survey (normalized by 100 m) = Number of cigarette related items of the survey x (100 / survey length) Then, this normalized number of cigarette related items is summed to obtain the total normalized number of cigarette related items for each survey. Finally, the median abundance of cigarette related items for each beach and year is calculated from these normalized abundances of cigarette related items per survey. Sometimes the survey length was null or equal to 0. Assuming that the MSFD protocol has been applied, the length has been set at 100m in these cases. Percentiles 50, 75, 95 & 99 have been calculated taking into account cigarette related items from MSFD monitoring data (excluding UNEP-MARLIN protocol) for all years. More information is available in the attached documents. Warning: the absence of data on the map does not necessarily mean that they do not exist, but that no information has been entered in the Marine Litter Database for this area.

Dataset summary Plankton and detritus are essential components of the Earth’s oceans influencing biogeochemical cycles and carbon sequestration. Climate change impacts their composition and marine ecosystems as a whole. To improve our understanding of these changes, standardized observation methods and integrated global datasets are needed to enhance the accuracy of ecological and climate models. Here, we present a global dataset for plankton and detritus obtained by two versions of the Underwater Vision Profiler 5 (UVP5). This release contains the images classified in 33 homogenized categories, as well as the metadata associated with them, reaching 3,114 profiles and ca. 8 million objects acquired between 2008-2018 at global scale. The geographical distribution of the dataset is unbalanced, with the Equatorial region (30° S - 30° N) being the most represented, followed by the high latitudes in the northern hemisphere and lastly the high latitudes in the Southern Hemisphere. Detritus is the most abundant category in terms of concentration (90%) and biovolume (95%), although its classification in different morphotypes is still not well established. Copepoda was the most abundant taxa within the plankton, with Trichodesmium colonies being the second most abundant. The two versions of UVP5 (SD and HD) have different imagers, resulting in a different effective size range to analyse plankton and detritus from the images (HD objects >600 µm, SD objects >1 mm) and morphological properties (grey levels, etc.) presenting similar patterns, although the ranges may differ. A large number of images of plankton and detritus will be collected in the future by the UVP5, and the public availability of this dataset will help it being utilized as a training set for machine learning and being improved by the scientific community. This will reduce uncertainty by classifying previously unclassified objects and expand the classification categories, ultimately enhancing biodiversity quantification. Data tables The data set is organised according to: - samples : Underwater Vision Profiler 5 profiles, taken at a given point in space and time. - objects : individual UVP images, taken at a given depth along the each profile, on which various morphological features were measured and that where then classified taxonomically in EcoTaxa. samples and objects have unique identifiers. The sample_id is used to link the different tables of the data set together. All files are Tab separated values, UTF8 encoded, gzip compressed. samples.tsv.gz - sample_id    <int>    unique sample identifier - sample_name    <text>    original sample identifier - project    <text>    EcoPart project title - lat, lon    <float>    location [decimal degrees] - datetime    <text>    date and time of start of profile [ISO 8601: YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ] - pixel_size    <float>    size of one pixel [mm] - uvp_model    <text>    version of the UVP: SD: standard definition, ZD: zoomed, HD: high definition samples_volume.tsv.gz Along a profile, the UVP takes many images, each of a fixed volume. The profiles are cut into 5 m depth bins in which the number of images taken is recorded and hence the imaged volume is known. This is necessary to compute concentrations. - sample_id    <int>    unique sample identifier - mid_depth_bin    <float>    middle of the depth bin (2.5 = from 0 to 5 m depth) [m] - water_volume_imaged    <float>    volume imaged = number of full images × unit volume [L] objects.tsv.gz - object_id    <int>     unique object identifier - object_name    <text>     original object identifier - sample_id    <int>     unique sample identifier - depth    <float>    depth at which the image was taken [m] - mid_depth_bin    <float>    corresponding depth bin [m]; to match with samples_volumes - taxon    <text>     original taxonomic name as in EcoTaxa; is not consistent across projects - lineage    <text>     taxonomic lineage corresponding to that name - classif_author    <text>     unique, anonymised identifier of the user who performed this classification - classif_datetime    <text>     date and time at which the classification was - group    <text>     broader taxonomic name, for which the identification is consistent over the whole dataset - group_lineage    <text>     taxonomic lineage corresponding to this broader group - area_mm2    <float>    measurements on the object, in real worl units (i.e. comparable across the whole dataset) … - major_mm    <float> - area    <float>    measurements on the objet, in [pixels] and therefore not directly comparable among the different UVP models and units - mean    <float> … - skeleton_area    <float> properties_per_bin.tsv.gz The information above allows to compute concentrations, biovolumes, and average grey level within a given depth bin. The code to do so is in `summarise_objects_properties.R`. - sample_id    <int>     unique sample identifier - depth_range    <text>     range of depth over which the concentration/biovolume are computed: (start,end], in [m] where `(` means not including, `]` means including - group    <text>     broad taxonomic group - concentration    <float>    concentration [ind/L] - biovolume    <float>    biovolume [mm3/L] - avg_grey    <float>    average grey level of particles [no unit; 0 is black, 255 is white] ODV_biovolumes.txt, ODV_concentrations.txt, ODV_grey_levels.txt This is the same information as above, formatted in a way that Ocean Data View https://odv.awi.de can read. In ODV, go to Import > ODV Spreadsheet and accept all default choices. Images The images are provided in a separate, much larger, zip file. They are stored with the format `sample_id/object_id.jpg`, where `sample_id` and `object_id` are the integer identifiers used in the data tables above.

This data set contains the gridded hydrographic and transport data for the biennial Go-Ship A25 Greenland–Portugal OVIDE section from 2002 to 2012. The properties and transports are mapped on a 7km x 1m grid. Using a common grid facilitates the comparison between the different occupations of the line and the averaging. This data set was used in Daniault et al. (2016, Progress in Oceanography) to which the reader is referred for a description of the gridding method.

This visualization product displays the density of floating micro-litter per net normalized in grams per km² per year from specific protocols different from research and monitoring protocols. EMODnet Chemistry included the collection of marine litter in its 3rd phase. Before 2021, there was no coordinated effort at the regional or European scale for micro-litter. Given this situation, EMODnet Chemistry proposed to adopt the data gathering and data management approach as generally applied for marine data, i.e., populating metadata and data in the CDI Data Discovery and Access service using dedicated SeaDataNet data transport formats. EMODnet Chemistry is currently the official EU collector of micro-litter data from Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) National Monitoring activities (descriptor 10). A series of specific standard vocabularies or standard terms related to micro-litter have been added to SeaDataNet NVS (NERC Vocabulary Server) Common Vocabularies to describe the micro-litter. European micro-litter data are collected by the National Oceanographic Data Centres (NODCs). Micro-litter map products are generated from NODCs data after a test of the aggregated collection including data and data format checks and data harmonization. A filter is applied to represent only micro-litter sampled according to a very specific protocol such as the Volvo Ocean Race (VOR) or Oceaneye. Densities were calculated for each net using the following calculation: Density (weight of particles per km²) = Micro-litter weight / (Sampling effort (km) * Net opening (cm) * 0.00001) When the weight of microlitters or the net opening was not filled, it was not possible to calculate the density. Percentiles 50, 75, 95 & 99 have been calculated taking into account data for all years. Warning: the absence of data on the map does not necessarily mean that they do not exist, but that no information has been entered in the National Oceanographic Data Centre (NODC) for this area.

'''Short description:''' Near-Real-Time mono-mission satellite-based integral parameters derived from the directional wave spectra. Using linear propagation wave model, only wave observations that can be back-propagated to wave converging regions are considered. The dataset parameters includes partition significant wave height, partition peak period and partition peak or principal direction given along swell propagation path in space and time at a 3-hour timestep, from source to land. Validity flags are also included for each parameter and indicates the valid time steps along propagation (eg. no propagation for significant wave height close to the storm source or any integral parameter when reaching the land). The integral parameters at observation point are also available together with a quality flag based on the consistency between each propagated observation and the overall swell field. This product is processed by the WAVE-TAC multi-mission SAR data processing system. It processes near-real-time data from the following missions: SAR (Sentinel-1A and Sentinel-1B) and CFOSAT/SWIM. One file is produced for each mission and is available in two formats depending on the user needs: one gathering in one netcdf file all observations related to the same swell field, and for another all observations available in a 3-hour time range, and for both formats, propagated information from source to land. '''DOI (product) :''' https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00178